• Cut Roses extended to 28 + days
  • Gerbera extended to 20 days
  • Gladioli extended to 20 days
  • Bananas (not treated with ethylene) extended to 27 + days
  • Corn extended to 21 days
  • Bananas (treated with ethylene) extended to 16 + days
  • Mango/Alphonso extended to 22 days
  • Baiganpally extended to 28 days
  • Ice berg Lettuce extended to 32 days

Chandra associates offers the following services:

  • Agro Technology
  • Product Development
  • Refrigeration
  • Readmore..

The Agreements Which Are in Restraint of Trade Are Mcq

The agreements which are in restraint of trade are an important concept in the legal world, and understanding their implications is crucial for businesses looking to avoid legal trouble. This article will explore the topic of these agreements and provide a clear explanation of their meaning.

First and foremost, it’s important to define what an agreement in restraint of trade is. Simply put, this type of agreement restricts or limits an individual’s ability to work in their chosen field. These agreements can take many different forms, from non-compete clauses in employment contracts to customer non-circumvention agreements in business-to-business relationships.

While these agreements may appear to have legitimate uses, such as protecting trade secrets or preventing employees from taking proprietary information to a competitor, they can also be used to unfairly restrict competition. This is why many jurisdictions closely regulate agreements in restraint of trade, requiring that they meet certain criteria before they can be considered valid.

One of the most important factors courts consider when evaluating these agreements is whether they are reasonable. This means that the restrictions placed on the individual must be necessary to protect a legitimate business interest, and must not be overly broad or excessive. For example, a non-compete clause that restricts an individual from working in their field for 10 years may be considered unreasonable, whereas a clause that limits employment with a direct competitor for 2 years may be seen as more reasonable.

Another crucial factor courts consider is the impact on competition. If an agreement in restraint of trade is found to have an anti-competitive effect, it may be deemed invalid. For example, if a large corporation required all of its suppliers to sign non-circumvention agreements, preventing them from selling to any of the corporation’s competitors, this would likely be seen as anti-competitive and a violation of antitrust laws.

To summarize, agreements in restraint of trade are used to limit or restrict an individual’s ability to work in their chosen field. While they can be used legitimately in certain circumstances, they must be reasonable and not have an anti-competitive effect. Businesses should therefore exercise caution when using these agreements, and seek legal advice to ensure they are in compliance with relevant laws and regulations.

Comments are closed.



  • 2012 Lauched New Product Line
  • 2011 Launched Technofresh Agri Solutions, India
  • PRO Institute Des Moines, 2010, Iowa, USA
  • NAFEM Show, 2009, Orlando, USA
  • Post Harvest 2008, Bangalore, India


2010 U.S. Patent issued for CA FILMS, Patent Number 7,772,139

2009 Book in Press to Microbial Safety of Fresh Produce, ISBN:978-0-8138-0416-3



20 Zain Circle

Milford, MA

01757, USA